Client Myers Bigel Prevails in Shareholder’s Race, Gender Bias Law Suit

Law360 | Bloomberg Law | North Carolina Lawyers Weekly | South Carolina Lawyers Weekly

In an article published by Law360, "Myers Bigel Dodges Race, Sex Bias Suit At 4th Circ.," employment attorney Kerry Shad is quoted regarding Smith Anderson’s client, Myers Bigel, and its former equity partner’s race discrimination and retaliation suit against the law firm for the purposes of Title VII. The noteworthy discrimination case was also covered in Bloomberg Law, North Carolina Lawyers Weekly and South Carolina Lawyers Weekly

The Law360 article addresses the Fourth Circuit’s decision in the case that shareholder partners and equity owners of a firm are not classified as "employees" and cannot declare "employee" status under Title VII. In addition, the plaintiff failed to prove that her race was the sole factor that led colleagues to bar her from taking time off, the Fourth Circuit found, making her requested leave-related allegations implausible.

Kerry told Law360 that several law firm partners have tried to declare employee status in previous discrimination cases. "The Fourth Circuit's decision makes clear that lawyers who are owners, entitled to vote and who share in profits are not 'employees,'" said Kerry. "The decision should apply with equal force to other professional services firms, including, for example, accounting firms and medical practices."

Kerry informed North Carolina Lawyers Weekly that the judges on the 4th Circuit seemed to understand the stakes. From their questions at oral argument, they seemed concerned that Lemon’s expansion of Title VII and antidiscrimination statutes might end up covering people not intended to be covered—not just partners in law firms, but shareholders in medical practices or even businesses with shareholders.

In Lemon v. Myers Bigel PA, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit concluded that Title VII’s anti-discrimination and anti-retaliation provisions were designed to protect "employees" and confirmed that Title VII doesn’t protect equity firm partners. Smith Anderson attorneys Isaac Linnartz and Kerry Shad represented Myers Bigel and ultimately led the Raleigh IP firm to a big win. Isaac and Kerry defended the Title VII claims on the basis that, as one of 25 equity "owners" of the firm, the plaintiff was not an "employee" and therefore not entitled to the protections of the statute.

Law360 subscribers can read the full article click here.

N.C. and S.C. Lawyers Weekly subscribers can read the full article here.

Law360 is a news source for legal news and analysis, covering major developments in litigation, legislation and transactions.

North Carolina Lawyers Weekly provides essential legal news and court decision coverage highlighting developments in case law, changes to court rules, verdict & settlement reports and all other news vital to North Carolina lawyers. Lawyers Weekly covers all decisions issued by the North Carolina Supreme Court and the North Carolina Court of Appeals, in addition to the hundreds of rulings from state Circuit Court judges, U.S. District Court judges, 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals judges and other state agencies.


Jump to Page

This website uses cookies to enhance your browsing experience and improve functionality. To learn more, you may view our Privacy Policy. By continuing to browse Smith Anderson's website, you are accepting our use of cookies in accordance with our privacy policy.