eTrends: Employment, Labor & Human Resources eTrends:
Employment, Labor & Human Resources
  05.24.2016  
 
Sign Up For Alerts
Twitter
Facebook
Print PDF

MORE INFORMATION

If you have questions about this Client Alert, please contact:

Practice Areas

 
 

Final Overtime Regulations Issued By DOL

By Susan Milner Parrott

On May 18, 2016, the federal Department of Labor (DOL) announced the publication of the much-anticipated final rule updating the overtime regulations under the federal Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA). The final rule was published in the Federal Register on May 23, 2016.   

In 2014, President Obama directed the DOL to modernize the regulations governing the executive, administrative, and professional exemptions. A proposed rule was published in July 2015 and the DOL received nearly 300,000 comments on that proposed rule during the two month comment period. The final rule, which will be effective December 1, 2016, raises the salary threshold level required for exemption from overtime as an administrative, executive, professional, outside sales, or computer employee (the EAP or “white collar” exemptions).

The FLSA requires that workers be paid a minimum wage for all hours worked in a workweek and no less than one and one-half times the worker’s regular rate of pay for hours worked over 40 in a workweek. However, the FLSA provides certain exemptions from these requirements. In order to be exempt from minimum wage and overtime as an EAP employee under the FLSA, the employee must satisfy three tests: (1) the employee must be paid a fixed salary that is not subject to reduction because of variations in quality or quantity of work performed (the salary basis test); (2) the salary must be of an amount at least equal to the specified threshold amount (salary level test); and (3) the employee’s primary job duties must be those duties delineated in the regulations applicable to each of the EAP exemptions (the duties test).

Key provisions of the final rule:

The key provisions of the final rule relate primarily to updating compensation levels for EAP workers. According to the DOL's Fact Sheet, the rule:

(1) Sets the standard salary level at the 40th percentile of earnings of full-time salaried workers in the lowest-wage Census Region, currently the South, which is $913.00 per week or $47,476 annually for a full-year worker;

(2) Sets the total annual compensation requirement for highly-compensated employees (HCE) subject to a minimal duties test to the annual equivalent of the 90th percentile of full-time salaried workers nationally, which is $134,004; and

(3) Establishes a mechanism for automatically updating the salary and compensation levels every three years to maintain the levels at the above percentiles and to ensure that they continue to provide useful and effective tests for exemption.

A significant change created by the final rule is that now, for the first time, employers may use non-discretionary bonuses and incentive payments, including commissions, to satisfy up to ten percent of the required salary threshold for employees other than HCEs. In order to credit a non-discretionary bonus or incentive payment towards a portion of the salary level, such payments must be paid on a quarterly or more frequent basis. The employer is permitted to make a “catch up payment” at the end of the applicable pay period. 

The final rule did not create any changes to the duties test. The DOL stated that the standard duties test and the HCE duties test both remain unchanged, it being the Department’s belief that, “as a result of the change to the salary level, the number of workers for whom employers must apply the duties test to determine exempt status is reduced, thus simplifying the exemption.”  Fact Sheet.

What employers should do now:

Employers should determine which of their employees who are currently treated as exempt are receiving salaries below the new threshold amount, $47,476. Once this group is identified, the employer should determine whether it would be better to raise the employee’s salary to $47,476 to maintain the exemption or to reclassify the employee as non-exempt. Employers may want to consider controlling overtime expenses by decreasing hours worked or reassigning duties to spread work among employees. If an employer reclassifies employees, the employer should consider whether formerly exempt employees may need training on timekeeping and compliance with employer policies such as use of email after regular work hours. In addition, employers may want to consider how best to communicate any required changes to minimize any adverse effect on employee morale.

 
. . .

Client Extranet  |  Sitemap  |  Disclaimer  |  Privacy Policy  |  ©2017

 

Smith Anderson publishes Alerts periodically as a service to clients and friends. The purpose of this Alert is to provide general information about significant legal developments and does not provide, and should not be relied upon as, legal advice. It does not convey an offer to represent you or an attorney-client relationship. Readers should be aware that the facts may vary from one situation to another, so the conclusions stated herein may not be applicable to the reader's particular circumstances. This communication may be considered a commercial electronic mail message under applicable legislation regarding unsolicited commercial email. 

 

Received this as a forward? SUBSCRIBE | UNSUBSCRIBE